Concepts of Right action
Concepts of Right action
P
Rajagopal Tampi
Introduction
Right
action is our response to a stimulus that is not coloured by any of our naturally
endowed positive or negative qualities like jealousies, anger, vindictiveness, biases,
likes, dislikes, life-conditioning and other such qualities. It is just the
simple, correct, honest, appropriate, well thought out response required from us to factually satisfy the
stimulus coming at us. It should only address and respond with integrity to the
core truths and facts of the oncoming stimulus, nothing more, nothing less. Emotions,
personal friendships, enmities and such aspects should not be involved in
formulating our response.
When our
response is perfect, it can right a wrong, or meet the need, or sometimes gives
just an honest answer to a question and it ends there. There are no follow-on repercussions, the matter closes.
Explanation
Imagine
that the stimulus is like an electrical charge which comes at you. If you
respond with the exact amount of charge to neutralize the charge of the
stimulus, the stimulus is extinguished. There are no surviving charge ripples
generated in the stimulus eco-system which can upset others. This is the
perfect situation.
If we
respond with an inappropriate charge, charge ripples are created and they
spread across the eco-system, causing other charge responses which will amplify
the charges involved, disturbing the peace of the ecosystem. When we respond
from our emotional and natural biases, we respond with inappropriate charges.
Right
action, creates peace, stillness and clarity of mind. That is what we should endeavour
for. Right action benefits everyone in the long run. There is no better
response than right action. It does not create ripples. There are no remaining
unbalanced charges in the eco-system. There is only stillness and peace.
Although I
have used the example of a stimulus coming at us, we should know that right
action is much larger than that. As you will note from my personal examples
below, right action is not only about appropriate fact-based response to
address the matter at hand. It also includes having the right intent and being
true to our response in the long term. Sometimes, even silence is the right action.
Illustrations
Most of
you would have heard of the “Adarsh” scam in India the mid-2000s. It involved
the multistorey building constructed on Defence land in Colaba that exemplified
corruption in India. The scam forced the Chief Minister’s resignation. Everyone
in the list of allottees was under the glare of the media and the investigative
authorities. The flats are still unoccupied. The money has not been refunded. Under
duress, I had reluctantly invested the initial deposit in the early under-construction
project. I was allotted a flat. About a year later, much before the scam broke
out, due to a fortuitous incident, I realized my mistake. How can I legally get
a flat in Colaba for Rs 70 lakhs when the market rate was Rs 7 crores or ten
times? Since I had no proper answer, I was sure that I did not want to be a
part of the project. I voluntarily gave up the flat and was refunded my booking
amount within 24 hours by cheque! Such was the demand for flats. In 2008, when
I was the Global CDO and CIO of Mastek Ltd, the scam broke in the newspapers
with names of the flat owners published. The PRO approached me rather discretely and asked me if I had a flat in the building. Had I not
voluntarily surrendered my flat, it is possible that I may have been sacked
from my job due to conflict with my top leadership role in the Company.
Many years
ago, I had an Englishman Tim (name changed) reporting to me. He was heading our
business of about 1000 persons in the UK not including the offshore teams. He
managed a government project worth 50 million pounds for the company in
addition to many other businesses. Tim was a contractor and I was uncomfortable
with a contractor managing the UK business. Unfortunately, Tim had refused to
become a permanent employee. I met Tim and told him that I was new and uncomfortable
with him leading the business as a contractor. I wanted him to continue and asked
him what it would take for him to become a permanent employee. He brought up a
tax issue due to which he would lose money if he became a permanent employee. I
spoke to the finance Manager and restructured his pay and incentives which
resulted in more take home pay or him and lesser outgoings for the company. He
agreed willingly. We focused on only the core issues and I was unwaveringly honest
that I needed him to take up permanent employment.
Later, we
had a very large project in a critical phase. The Solution architect, a key
resource had a personal unavoidable need to go on leave. We were not in a
position to grant the leave as there was no one with the knowledge to replace
him. Finally, I called him to my office
and explained the issue. I suggested that he delay his departure by about two
weeks with a tweak to his personal plan which I felt was workable. He wanted an
assurance from me that he would be given his leave after two weeks. I gave him
my word. After two weeks, his managers refused to relieve him. I overruled
them, he went on leave. The project succeeded, he was very loyal, we
had a wonderful connection and have even become friends.
Conclusion
As
Managers or human beings, we have to train our minds to recognize the facts of
the matter and not be distracted by the surrounding noise. It is not very difficult if
we try and focus only on the matter on hand and filter out the actors and the
noise that they create. Our intent and actions must be honest and right. I believe this is
the best policy in life and at work.
There may
be many who may think that cleverness trumps righteousness. I reserve
my right to disagree based on my life’s experiences. Time and again, I have
only been rewarded in the long run for my beliefs and right actions.
Life is
utterly amazing. We must have faith and trust in our true convictions and we
should steer their steady path. I believe Universality will then play out in our best
interest.
The views expressed are the solely that of
the author. There may be other views existing on the topic and the author’s
intention is not to create any conflicts.
Comments
Post a Comment